Are ACT’s anti-treaty policies diluting down indigenous rights for Māori.
ACT leader David Seymour’s proposed Treaty Principles Bill has sparked a fierce debate in New Zealand, with many Māori groups and advocates arguing that it would undermine their rights and the Treaty’s original intent. The bill aims to redefine the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, which was signed in 1840 and established a relationship between the British Crown and Māori chiefs. It exists in two versions – one in English and one in Māori – leading to differing interpretations and ongoing debates about its meaning and application.
Seymour’s bill proposes three key principles: one law and government for all New Zealanders, self-determination for all citizens, and equal rights and duties. However, Māori groups and advocates argue that these principles would effectively suppress their rights and undermine the Treaty’s original intent. They fear that the principle of “Self-Determination for All” could be interpreted as diluting the unique right of Māori to self-determination (tino rangatiratanga), which is enshrined in the Treaty and is essential for Māori to exercise control over their own affairs and cultural practices. They also argue that the proposed principles ignore the historical context of the Treaty, which was signed with Māori as the original inhabitants of the land. The Treaty acknowledged Māori rights and sovereignty, and its principles should be interpreted in light of this historical context. Furthermore, they worry that the bill could undermine the progress made in Treaty settlements, which are based on the principle of partnership and redress for historical injustices.
Māori groups and leaders have expressed strong opposition to Seymour’s Treaty Principles Bill, arguing that it is an attempt to rewrite the Treaty and undermine the rights of Māori. They have organized protests and calls for its rejection, highlighting the ongoing tension between Māori and non-Māori perspectives on the Treaty and its application in contemporary New Zealand.
Religious leaders across New Zealand have strongly opposed David Seymour’s Treaty Principles Bill. Over 400 church leaders, including prominent figures from the Anglican, Catholic, Methodist, and Salvation Army denominations, signed an open letter urging MPs to reject the bill. The letter emphasized that the bill contradicts the principles of Te Tiriti o Waitangi by failing to recognize the collective rights of iwi Māori and their relationship with the Crown. The leaders argued that the bill would undermine decades of legal and policy advancements that honor Te Tiriti.
David Seymour responded by criticizing the church’s involvement, claiming it was undemocratic and reminiscent of past opposition to his policies, such as the End of Life Choice Act. He argued that the bill is necessary for ensuring equal rights for all New Zealanders, regardless of ancestry.
This issue highlights the complex and often contentious relationship between the Treaty of Waitangi, Māori rights, and broader societal values in New Zealand. The church leaders’ opposition reflects a deep concern that the bill would undermine the Treaty’s principles and the progress made in recognizing Māori rights. Seymour’s response, however, emphasizes his commitment to individual equality and a unified legal framework for all New Zealanders.
The debate raises important questions about the role of the Treaty in contemporary New Zealand, the balance between individual rights and indigenous rights, and the extent to which religious institutions should engage in political discourse. It remains to be seen how this issue will be resolved and what impact it will have on the future of the Treaty in New Zealand.
