Former U.S. President Donald Trump recently found himself in the midst of a civil fraud trial in New York, where he delivered a defiant and rambling testimony. The trial, initiated by New York Attorney General Letitia James, alleges a yearslong fraud scheme involving Trump and his family’s business empire. As the proceedings unfolded, Trump’s testimony, characterized by evasiveness and self-promotion, raised questions about his credibility and the potential consequences he may face.

During his approximately four-hour testimony, Trump often veered off-topic and evaded direct questions. Instead, he seized the opportunity to boast about his properties and wealth, casting doubt on his commitment to addressing the allegations against him. Judge Arthur Engoron repeatedly reprimanded Trump for straying from the core issues and accused him of unfair treatment.

The fraud case revolves around accusations that Trump’s company inflated property values to secure better financing. Trump admitted that the valuations were not always accurate but claimed they contained disclaimers. The New York state lawyers have sought $250 million in fines and business restrictions for Trump and his sons, Eric and Donald Jr.

Judge Engoron has already found Trump and his companies liable for fraud, which could potentially result in the loss of control over some of his properties. Throughout his testimony, Trump accused Attorney General Letitia James and the judge of targeting him for political reasons, suggesting a biased approach to the trial.

The outcome of the trial ultimately rests in the hands of Judge Engoron, who will weigh Trump’s testimony along with other evidence. The judge will determine whether negative conclusions can be drawn from Trump’s evasive responses and self-promotion during the trial.

Former President Donald Trump’s recent court case has generated significant attention due to his defiant testimony and the serious allegations surrounding his business practices. As the trial unfolds, it remains to be seen how the judge will assess Trump’s credibility and the potential ramifications for his properties and financial standing. The case serves as a reminder of the legal challenges faced by public figures and the accountability they must uphold in the face of serious accusations.